Kinder
Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline will never be built. That might appear to be a bold statement,
given the federal Liberal government’s recent commitment to pour taxpayer’s
money into the project to keep it afloat. (see: "We are going to get the pipeline built': Trudeau begins federal talks with Kinder Morgan to guarantee Trans Mountain,” the National Post, April 15, 2018). Our Prime Minister has staked his political reputation on ramming this
pipeline through a province, British Columbia, that just last year elected a
government that, on the campaign trail, committed to doing everything in its
power to stop the project.
B.C.
Premier John Horgan is heading to court to determine whether his government can
regulate the transport of diluted bitumen through the province. (see: "B.C. Is Taking the Kinder Morgan Question to Court. Here’s What you Need to Know.” Emma Gilchrist, DesmogCanada, April 18, 2018). Horgan’s
concerns are environmental: oil spills from the pipeline on land, and along the
pristine B.C. coast. Federal Finance
Minister Bill Morneau claims that the pipeline falls wholly within the purview
of the federal government (see: "Morneau shoots down Singh's high court proposal to end pipeline standoff,” CBC News, April 11, 2018), but constitutional experts like Jack Woodward have
indicated that the feds can’t so easily ignore B.C.’s interests in protecting
the natural environment, or the constitutional rights of indigenous peoples (see: "They’re Not Getting How the Constitution Works’: Why Trudeau, Notley Can’t Steamroll B.C. on Kinder Morgan Pipeline,” Emma Gilchrist, DesmogCanada, April 13, 2018).
Ultimately,
it’s that math that just doesn’t add up over the longer term. The political calculus suggests the Liberals
are going to have to come to terms with the policy contradiction that they’ve
been foisting on Canadians: that we can lower our greenhouse gas emissions
while simultaneously allowing the tar sands to double in size. Experts have long known that Canada can’t do
both. Increasingly, Canadians are becoming
aware that Trudeau and the Liberals have been trying to pull a fast one on
them. And it’s all coming to a head over
Trans Mountain.
Will
Trudeau continue to find his government entrenched on the side of the oil
multinationals, supporting a fossil status quo that will ultimately be washed
away by the tide of history? Pundits
have claimed that Trudeau needs Alberta NDP Premier Rachel Notley’s support for
his climate action plan. And Notley
needs a pipeline. But with an election
scheduled in Alberta in a little over a year, Notley is NDP seem likely to be
swept away by the tides of Jason Kenney’s United Conservative Party. With Liberal seats at risk in Quebec, and climate-hostile
governments in Alberta, Saskatchewan and potentially in Ontario, might Trudeau
opt to become the climate champion that he pretended to be on the campaign
trail?
The
economics of the Trans Mountain pipeline suggest he should. Demand for Canada’s heavy oil is already
slumping, thanks to cheaper, easier-to-process oil from the United States (see: "Kinder Morgan is just bad economics getting worse,” Dr. David Robinson, Economics for Northern Ontario, April 17, 2018). With nations like oil-exporting Norway
passing laws to phase out internal combustion engines (see: "Norway to 'completely ban petrol powered cars by 2025", Independent, June 4, 2016), the world is poised to
move forward with the electrification of our transport systems. And if we have any hope of meeting our Paris
greenhouse gas emissions reductions targets, this global project is one that
must be undertaken.
While
Justin Trudeau wants to find a political compromise to save the pipeline, he can’t
compromise with the atmosphere. At Paris, Canada committed to holding global
warming to just two degrees Celsius. Doubling production of the tar sands puts
us on a course where will blow through our 2030 emissions reduction target,
just as we’ve blown through every other national target.
In the
past, though, average Canadians and elected members of parliament weren’t
getting arrested for opposing fossil fuel infrastructure projects (see: “B.C. MPs Elizabeth May, Kennedy Stewart arrested at Kinder Morgan facility,” Global News, March 26, 2018). Our growing global awareness of our moral
obligations to future generations will need, at some point, to be reflected in
the decisions of our political leaders (see: "We need to attack the morality of fossil fuel investment,” the Guardian, March 11, 2015).
If the Liberals can’t adapt to this new environment, they too will be
swept away by the tide of history.
As long as
people – from indigenous and settler communities – are willing to stand up for
the future, as they are doing now on Burnaby Mountain, Kinder Morgan’s Trans
Mountain pipeline will never be built.
(opinions expressed in this blog are my own and should not be interpreted as being consistent with the views and/or policies of the Green Parties of Ontario and Canada)
Originally published as "Pipeline will never be built," the Sudbury Star, April 21, 2018 (in print and online).
1 comment:
Steve, I really hope you're right. There are a lot of us who figure we might go the mug shot and fingerprint route before this is over. Those of us who are familiar with this coast, especially beyond our urban centres, have a fondness for it, a genuine attachment to it and the idea of placing it at catastrophic risk for the sake of something as environmentally destructive as bitumen is unacceptable. I know that inland, the closer you get to Alberta and into BC's own coal and fracking regions the more support there is for Trans Mountain. That includes a lot of Albertan retirees in the Kelowna/Penticton/Kamloops region. Trudeau's reality is that he's not getting their votes anyway. The seats he picked up in 2015 were urban and that means coastal.
If we can get Horgan to live up to his election reform referendum without doing something to sabotage it who knows, we Greens might be the first to really make inroads in a Canadian province. Wouldn't that be pleasant?
Post a Comment